Concerns of Lipid Nanoparticle Carrying mRNA Vaccine into the Brain: What to Make of It?

[Stone]

WHEN INOCULATED RNA IS CONVERTED TO DNA IN THE BODY ...

Computer translated from a German article here (slightly edited).

Inoculated RNA can of course be converted into DNA! This fact should be known to everyone - and has been for some time. This is by no means a secret ... although different sides claim to be exactly the opposite!

In order to be able to orientate yourself better in this topic:

What kind of vaccines are we currently finding on the market?

1. RNA vaccines (e.g. BioNTech's new vaccine)

2. DNA vaccines / (vector vaccines) (e.g. AstraZeneca's new vaccine)

3. other vaccines, e.g. B. Live or dead vaccines (e.g. against measles or diphtheria)

The first two are genetically modified substances. Again clarified: A transfer takes place through genetically modified nucleic acids.

The RNA is a transcript of a code (section), the mRNA acts as a messenger. This genetically modified RNA, which they intend to give us with the new vaccines, is used to pass on this information, to provide a blueprint. 

RNA vaccines shorten the effectiveness of DNA vaccines, using methods of nanotechnology. ( Nanoparticles are extremely dangerous for the bioorganism and cause irreparable damage) . RNA is introduced directly into our cytoplasm. You basically skip a step that should have been implemented with DNA vaccines.

Vaccines that interfere with blueprints and DNA are genetic experiments that mess with our genome.

Nobody is in a position to be able to estimate one hundred percent what this manipulation will cause in our body in the long term, as studies and research have already uncovered numerous unpredictable consequential damages.


RNA VACCINES CAUSED TISSUE CHANGES (SYMPTOMS OF DISEASE) AND SERIOUS AUTOIMMUNE REACTIONS

All structures and functions of living beings are essentially determined and controlled by proteins (proteins) and protein compounds - their targeted and strictly controlled production is therefore indispensable for every form of life.

The exact blueprint for this protein synthesis is encoded in the "genetic information" of every living being (although it must be said that no DNA could be found as a blueprint for 90% of the proteins) , in humans in the so-called DNA, which is the essential component of the so called chromosomes in the nucleus of human cells.

In order to transport these protein blueprints into the protein-producing cell components (the so-called ribosomes) , their information is transferred to much smaller transport molecules, the so-called messenger RNA (so-called transcription). These mRNA molecules then serve in the ribosomes as direct instructions for the synthesis of highly complex (body) proteins (so-called translation), which after their assembly, depending on their function, either remain in the cell, are built into its shell or are also removed for further transport can be channeled out of the cell.

So the sequence of protein production in the body is as follows:

Hereditary information (DNA)> messenger substance (mRNA)> protein.

(Whereby no DNA blueprint could be found for 90% of the proteins ...)

This sequence is - again, in a simplistic way, the “central dogma of protein biosynthesis” ( Crick F. 1970. Nature 227, 561-563 (1970) ) - a one-way street, which is important for the discussion about the safety of DNA and mRNA vaccines is of great importance.

So it seemed impossible, and so it is still argued in security discussions about mRNA vaccines today, that genetic information from an RNA (e.g. the vaccine) is written back into the DNA (e.g. the hereditary information) of the vaccinated person could.

But we will learn in a moment that there are exceptions to this order, as it also works the other way round. This reduces the claim that RNA cannot change DNA to absurdity.

Ever since HIV [misinterpretation, the virus has never been scientifically proven] , however, it has been known that this is not correct: Numerous [misinterpreted] viruses, especially so-called retroviruses such as HIV, contain enzymes that can very well synthesize DNA from RNA : so called reverse transcriptases (RTs).

And what's more: The poor tolerability of the first HIV drugs, which were intended to specifically inhibit these enzymes, which were then only suspected to be found in viruses, was due, among other things, to the fact that human cells also contain RTs ( cf. spectrum ). This means that the incorporation of (e.g. vaccinated) RNA into the DNA of the person being vaccinated cannot be ruled out in human cells and can certainly lead to changes in our genetic information.

Another fact: the conversion of RNA to DNA (retrotransposon)

Caution ❗️The following viruses have not been scientifically proven to date and have not been isolated either. These are misinterpretations of completely normal physical processes.

Reverse transcriptase was first discovered in retroviruses (e.g. HIV, HTLV, SIV). These viruses with an RNA genome use RT to rewrite their genome into DNA. The RT thus fulfills a crucial function in the multiplication of the virus. In addition, certain DNA viruses, such as the hepadnaviruses (e.g. the pathogen causing hepatitis B (HBV, the protein P), or the caulimoviruses that occur in plants) also contain an RT. The class I transposons, also called retro elements, are also derived from former, mutated retroviruses. These need an RT for their replication. This is either coded by you (autonomous LINEs and LTR retrotransposons) or must be made available (e.g. with SINEs). (Wiki excerpt as of March 11, 2021)

If the situation with the vector vaccine is clear for everyone, unfortunately that does not seem to have reached everyone with regard to the mRNA vaccines. The science magazine Spektrum rightly writes that the following vaccines can cause a change in DNA, but is apparently not aware of the problems of RNA vaccines.

The AstraZeneca vaccine, like the candidates from Johnson & Johnson / Janssen and the Russian vaccine Sputnik V, are vector vaccines based on adenoviruses, from which scientists have removed the genes necessary for their reproduction. AstraZeneca uses a pathogen that occurs naturally in chimpanzees (called Y25), and the Johnson & Johnson vaccine uses human adenovirus 26.

Adenovirus vaccines get into the nucleus

"That makes me a little nervous," says Christian Münz, professor of viral immunobiology at the University of Zurich.

DNA that is present in the cell nucleus outside of the chromosomes can be incorporated into the genome - a random process known as heterologous recombination. "Unfortunately, this integration doesn't happen as rarely as one would hope for," says Christian Münz.

"In mice, one in a million injected viruses is integrated into the host DNA - and with the AstraZeneca vaccine, 25 to 50 billion viruses are injected, depending on the dosage."

This results in a higher risk of long-term damage compared to the RNA vaccine. Cancer, as it appeared in early gene therapies, could result. "However, they used retro and lentiviruses that integrate much more frequently," says Münz. "With adenoviruses, the risk is much lower." Source: Spektrum - Is adenovirus DNA built into the genome?

I'm quoting from a post by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (from a narrative point of view)

“Untested and highly controversial experimental RNA technology that Gates has supported for over a decade . Instead of injecting an antigen and an adjuvant as with conventional vaccines, Moderna injects a small piece of the genetic code of the coronavirus into human cells. It changes DNA throughout the human body and reprograms our cells to produce antibodies to fight the virus. MRNA vaccines are a form of genetic engineering called "germline gene editing". The genetic changes of the Moderna are then passed on to future generations. "

Here are some of the disadvantages of RNA vaccines:

This latter natural instability of the mRNA is also one of the problems in the preparation and administration of mRNA vaccines. On the one hand to prevent or at least delay the degradation of the mRNA, and on the other hand to bring the administered (e.g. injected) mRNA to where it works (i.e. into the cells, where the ribosomes then carry out the desired protein synthesis ), a wide variety of highly complex additives are used. For very few of these additives, meaningful safety studies are currently available (Roier S. 2019. Trillium Immunologie 3/2019. Accessed on May 3rd, 2020), some of the most frequently used aids can be assigned to nanotechnology (e.g. lipon nanoparticles, LNPs), for which there is only very limited and contradicting experience in human use.

(See MEGA risk from NANO particles - destruction of tissue and genetic information)

Even more obviously than with conventional vaccines, the transferability of studies on laboratory animals to humans does not seem to be guaranteed with mRNA vaccines. In two of the most recent mRNA vaccine studies (rabies and influenza), despite an excellent immune response (in reality the poisoning of the body) in the test animals (mice, but also larger mammals such as monkeys or pigs) in human subjects, a low or no antibody formation was found .

Pardi N. 2020. Current Opinion in Immunology. 65: 14–20 (PDF page 18/19)

Even the few studies available with human subjects indicate that there is considerable potential for severe vaccine side effects: In the largest such study to date on a rabies vaccine by the German company CureVac, 78% of only 101 subjects showed systemic side effects (fever, chills, ...) and one of the vaccinated people even suffered from facial nerve paralysis.

Alberer M. 2017. The Lancet. 390 (10101): 1511-20

Pardi N. 2018. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 17 (4): 261-79

Other studies with mRNA vaccines on human volunteers also showed severe local or systemic (inflammatory) reactions, including autoimmunological inflammatory processes (Pardi 2018).

Pardi N. 2018. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 17 (4): 261-79

In addition, the mRNA, which inevitably occurs outside of the cells during mRNA vaccinations, causes various pathological reactions, including a change in cell wall permeability (with the possible consequence of water retention / edema) and a promotion of pathological blood clotting with the risk of thrombosis.

Pardi N. 2018. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 17 (4): 261-79


FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF CONVENTIONAL MEDICINE, THE VACCINATION SHOULD NOT BE USED

1. Because RNA is converted to DNA by several mechanisms and will damage chromosomes.

2. Because it affects the body's own enzymes, which are misinterpreted as components of the virus.

Strictly speaking, the BioNTech RNA vaccine is more dangerous than nanoparticles themselves, because the vaccine RNA is packaged in lipo nanoparticles and we find a double-reactive mixture here that primarily ends up in the brain and will cause narcolepsy much more frequently than is the case with swine flu. Vaccine was the case.

The vaccine from Mainz (mRNA) contains fats in their non-dissolvable and constantly very reactive nano-particle form, including the solvent PEG (polyethylene glycol) known as an allergen. In addition, in an unknown number of people, the vaccine will lead to chromosome strand breaks and the resulting energy weakness, infertility and disability of the offspring, namely when the chromosome strand breaks also occur in the "germ line" of men and women.

This is the shortest possible description of the vaccine damage for which Ugur Sahin is personally responsible and which will certainly lead to an observable number of deaths which are then attributed to the virus as a result.

From the point of view of the superstition in an evil biology (conventional medicine), coupled with the collective return obligation, one might actually be inclined to assume that the doctors believe in the effectiveness of the vaccination.

Our task should not be to demonize those responsible, but to show them their mistakes so that they can recognize their faulty approach themselves.