Welcome, Guest
You have to register before you can post on our site.

Username
  

Password
  





Search Forums

(Advanced Search)

Forum Statistics
» Members: 300
» Latest member: zisabelattsz3874
» Forum threads: 6,880
» Forum posts: 12,826

Full Statistics

Online Users
There are currently 207 online users.
» 0 Member(s) | 203 Guest(s)
Bing, Facebook, Google, Twitter

Latest Threads
Oratory Conference: “Who...
Forum: Conferences
Last Post: Deus Vult
Yesterday, 07:52 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 162
Fr. Ruiz: 2025 04 20 EL E...
Forum: Fr. Ruiz's Sermons April 2025
Last Post: Deus Vult
04-21-2025, 08:22 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 67
St. Alphonsus Liguori: Da...
Forum: Easter
Last Post: Stone
04-21-2025, 06:38 AM
» Replies: 7
» Views: 10,022
Easter Week [Monday thru ...
Forum: Easter
Last Post: Stone
04-21-2025, 06:38 AM
» Replies: 8
» Views: 24,071
Pope Francis has died age...
Forum: Pope Francis
Last Post: Stone
04-21-2025, 06:35 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 188
Fr. Hesse: Decline of Cha...
Forum: Add'nl Clergy
Last Post: Stone
04-20-2025, 05:45 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 139
Keeping the Faith Without...
Forum: Articles by Catholic authors
Last Post: Stone
04-20-2025, 05:43 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 145
Easter Sunday
Forum: Easter
Last Post: Stone
04-20-2025, 04:52 AM
» Replies: 7
» Views: 20,215
St. Gregory the Great: Se...
Forum: Easter
Last Post: Stone
04-20-2025, 04:47 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 6,656
Dom Guéranger: The Histor...
Forum: Easter
Last Post: Stone
04-20-2025, 04:45 AM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 4,789

 
  The Most Pressing Need in the World Today: Restoring the Belief in Immutable Catholic Truth
Posted by: Stone - 08-12-2024, 08:38 AM - Forum: Vatican II and the Fruits of Modernism - No Replies

The Most Pressing Need in the World Today: Restoring the Belief in Immutable Catholic Truth

[Image: b91965fca2fe5021753939983c8e2b1d_L.jpg]


By:  Robert Morrison, Columnist [slightly adapted, red font emphasis mine] | August 11, 2024

“Then Jesus said to those Jews, who believed Him: If you continue in My word, you shall be My disciples indeed. And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.” (John 8:31-32)

Commenting on this passage from the Gospel of St. John, St Augustine emphasized the unchanging, or immutable, nature of truth:
Quote:“The truth is unchangeable; it is the bread of the soul, refreshing others, without diminution to itself; changing him who eats into itself, itself not changed. This truth is the Word of God, which put on flesh for our sakes, and lay hid; not meaning to bury itself, but only to defer its manifestation, till its suffering in the body, for the ransoming of the body of sin, had taken place.” (from St. Thomas Aquinas, Catena Aurea)

Actual truth cannot change because the Word of God cannot change. St. Paul expressed the same reality in his letter to the Hebrews:

“Jesus Christ, yesterday, and today; and the same for ever. Be not led away with various and strange doctrines.” (Hebrews 13:8-9)

St. Paul warned us against being “led away with various and strange doctrines” because he recognized that this was a genuine threat to our Faith: there are those who will try to lead us away from God’s immutable truth. St. Paul went so far as to insist that one must cling to immutable truth even if it appears that reliable authority figures tell us that the truth must change:
Quote:“I wonder that you are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ, unto another gospel. Which is not another, only there are some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ. But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach a gospel to you besides that which we have preached to you, let him be anathema. As we said before, so now I say again: If any one preach to you a gospel, besides that which you have received, let him be anathema.” (Galatians 1:6-9)

This is such a vital concept that St. Paul repeated it so as to avoid any misunderstanding. Nobody, not even St. Paul himself or an angel from heaven, can change the truth that the Apostles taught.

Of course it is the case that expressions of the Catholic Faith have developed in the centuries since St. Paul warned us against accepting changes to the Faith. As we know, the Church has been guided by the Holy Ghost to perfect the expressions of certain truths, often to clarify and expand upon the truths that Our Lord entrusted to His disciples for the sake of combatting heresies. In each instance, though, St. Paul and everyone else who understood Catholic truth would recognize that the legitimate development of particular expressions of the Faith always elaborate upon and clarify, rather than contradict, the truths they had taught.

Pope Pius XII was the last pope to firmly warn against the errors that threatened to lead Catholics to believe that the Faith could change to become something that contradicted what it had always been. His 1950 encyclical “Concerning Some False Opinions Threatening to Undermine the Foundations of Catholic Doctrine,” Humani Generis, he denounced the errors that had already started to find their way into Catholic books and seminaries:
Quote:“Such fictitious tenets of evolution which repudiate all that is absolute, firm and immutable, have paved the way for the new erroneous philosophy which, rivaling idealism, immanentism and pragmatism, has assumed the name of existentialism, since it concerns itself only with existence of individual things and neglects all consideration of their immutable essences. There is also a certain historicism, which attributing value only to the events of man's life, overthrows the foundation of all truth and absolute law, both on the level of philosophical speculations and especially to Christian dogmas.”

This last error — historicism — posits that truths of the Faith can evolve over time depending upon historical circumstances, such that what St. Paul considered to be immutable during his time may be different now because our world has changed. It should be clear that St. Paul would have found such an assertion to be preposterous, dangerous, and obviously contradicted by the plain terms of his warning.

Before considering two post-Vatican II manifestations of historicism below, it is worthwhile to see the way in which the error spread prior to the Council despite Pius XII’s warning in Humani Generis that historicism “overthrows the foundation of all truth and absolute law.” The following excerpt from the August 1993 SiSiNoNo explains so much about the crisis in the Catholic Church:
Quote:“Confirmation of this treachery comes to us today, from the very lips of those representing this New Theology. A mouthpiece of theirs is the journal Communio and in an article of November-December, 1990, the Jesuit Fr. Peter Henrici (born 1928) tells us that: . . . Behind that facade of official studies, modernist texts and tracts were secretly circulated to the most brilliant and promising seminarians. Those same modernist concepts, secretly passed around, would later reappear as the New Theology. Those who showed interest and promise in theology, would be given the modernist Fr. Henri de Lubac's book: The Supernatural - the most forbidden of forbidden books! Then they would receive another of his books, Corpus Mysticum. This was done to inculcate them with the principle that identical theological terms could have different meanings with the passage of time or when looked at in another context. Thus we say goodbye to unchanging divine and apostolic Tradition! Goodbye to the homogenous development of dogma! Goodbye to unchangeable truths!”

Yes, thanks to the insidious work of those who sought to spread what Pius XII had forbidden, the future priests were poisoned with the belief that “identical theological terms could have different meanings with the passage of time or when looked at in another context.” Although such a pernicious error can only have been devised by the father of lies, many well-meaning clerics allowed the foundations of their Faith to be overthrown by historicism. Two examples (chosen from among many) should suffice to demonstrate the extent of damage that has resulted from this catastrophe:


Vatican II and Religious Liberty.

It is beyond serious dispute that Vatican II’s Dignitatis Humanae said something fundamentally different from what the pre-Vatican II popes taught. As discussed in a previous article, Cardinal Ratzinger (the future Benedict XVI) likened Dignitatis Humanae and other Council documents to a “countersyllabus,” meaning that the Council’s key documents essentially promoted the errors that Pope Pius IX had condemned in his Syllabus of Errors, which accompanied the pope’s 1864 encyclical, Quanta Cura. In his They Have Uncrowned Him, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre quoted Fr. Yves Congar’s explanation for how the architects of the Council’s documents justified their deviation from pre-Conciliar teaching by suggesting that the historical circumstances had evolved:
Quote:“Father John Courtney Murray, who belonged to the intellectual and religious elite, has shown that, materially saying quite the opposite from the Syllabus — this latter is from 1864 and it is, as Roger Aubert has proven, conditioned by precise historical circumstances — the Declaration [Dignitatis Humanae] was the consequence of the battle by which, in the face of Jacobism and the totalitarianisms, the Popes more and more strongly led the fight for the dignity of the liberty of the human person made to the image of God.” (p. 185)

So, Congar and Murray would argue, it might have been true for the popes to condemn religious liberty in their time, but times have changed. Archbishop Lefebvre rejected this historicist attempt to justify the rejection of what the Church had previously taught:
Quote:“On the contrary, we have seen that Roger Aubert and John Courtney Murray are themselves prisoners of the historicist prejudice which makes them erroneously relativize the doctrine of the Popes of the nineteenth century! In reality, the Popes have condemned religious liberty in itself, as a freedom that is absurd, ungodly, and leading the peoples to religious indifference. This condemnation remains, and, with the authority of the constant ordinary magisterium of the Church (if not of the extraordinary magisterium, with Quanta Cura), it weighs on the conciliar declaration.” (pp. 185-196)

Today we see the absolute absurdity of believing that the pre-Vatican II popes were speaking only for unique historical situations. Vatican II’s purported embrace of the freedom to openly practice all religions may not have had a direct practical effect in non-Catholic nations, but it erroneously signaled two things to the world. It falsely indicated that the Church no longer condemned the proposition that “liberty of conscience and worship is each man’s personal right,” which Quanta Cura had aptly described as the “liberty of perdition.” It also suggested that the Church had embraced the destructive historicism that Pius XII had condemned.


Bishop of Rome Document and Vatican I.

Thanks in large part to the tragic reality that historicism has destroyed the concept of immutable truth in the minds of many (perhaps most) clerics and theologians, the authors of the new Bishop of Rome document did not need to even attempt to mask their contempt for immutable Catholic truth. While we could cite numerous examples from the document, arguably the most explicit is in the call to reinterpret Vatican I in the light of the most liberal readings of Vatican II’s documents:
Quote:“Among the proposals expressed by the dialogues, the call for a Catholic ‘re-reception’ or official commentary of Vatican I seems particularly important. Assuming the hermeneutical rule that the dogmas of Vatican I must be read in the light of Vatican II, especially its teaching on the People of God (LG, chapter II) and collegiality (LG 22–23), some dialogues reflect that Vatican II did not explicitly interpret Vatican I but, while incorporating its teaching, complemented it (LG, chapter III, 18).”

Footnote 13 cited Cardinal Ratzinger on the need to reinterpret Vatican I:

“Joseph Ratzinger: ‘Just as within Holy Scripture there is the phenomenon of relecture [...], so likewise the individual dogmas and pronouncements of the Councils are not to be understood as isolated, but rather in the process of dogmatic–historical relecture within this unity of the history of faith. [...] That this insight is of fundamental significance for the interpretation of Vatican I, is obvious’, (Joseph Ratzinger, Das neue Volk Gottes: Entwürfe zur Ekklesiologie, 2nd ed. [Düsseldorf: Patmos, 1970], 140–141)”

This may surprise some Catholics, but we should recall that Henri de Lubac — who was a key proponent of historicism — had a tremendous influence of the future Benedict XVI. We can get a sense of de Lubac’s profound influence by reading the words of Cardinal Ratzinger’s 1988 forward to de Lubac’s famous book, Catholicism: Christ and the Common Destiny of Man:
Quote:“It is now almost forty years since, in late autumn of 1949, a friend gave me a copy of de Lubac’s book Catholicism. For me, the encounter with this book became an essential milestone on my theological journey. . . It was not only for me that de Lubac’s book marked such a turning point. It fascinated theologians in the fifties everywhere and his fundamental insights became the patrimony of theological reflection. The narrow-minded individualistic Christianity against which he strove is hardly our problem today. Everyone is teaching about the social dimension of dogma.”

Because, according to Cardinal Ratzinger, “everyone” was teaching de Lubac’s ideas in 1988, it should come as little surprise that relatively few Catholic clerics and theologians have any sense of the immutable nature of Catholic truth today.

Of course the most striking illustration of this failure to appreciate the immutable nature of Catholic truth is the ongoing Synod on Synodality — with its listening sessions to discern how to change Catholic teaching — but we can see an even more important example in Benedict XVI’s final address to the clergy of Rome. In it, the follower of de Lubac explained how various historical changes during his lifetime had led to theological changes. One of the most unfortunate comments related to the development of the pernicious teaching on ecumenism, which has effaced the teaching that there is no salvation outside the Church (absent standard exceptions):
Quote:“Finally, ecumenism. I do not want to enter now into these problems, but it was obvious – especially after the ‘passions’ suffered by Christians in the Nazi era – that Christians could find unity, or at least seek unity, yet it was also clear that God alone can bestow unity. And we are still following this path.”

According to Benedict XVI, the Nazi era caused theologians to rethink the teaching that the only path to unity was through a process of non-Catholics accepting immutable Catholic truth. But Pope Pius XII had condemned the key components of today’s ecumenical movement in Humani Generis, from 1950 (which was after the Nazi era). So perhaps it was “obvious” to some theological opportunists that the time was ripe to try to reshape fundamental Catholic teaching, but it was evidently obvious to Pius XII that Catholics had a duty to resist the false ecumenism that dominates Rome today. Unfortunately, we know which side prevailed at the Council.

Why is all of this important today? Historicism has caused the evil against which Pius XII had warned:
Quote:“There is also a certain historicism, which attributing value only to the events of man's life, overthrows the foundation of all truth and absolute law, both on the level of philosophical speculations and especially to Christian dogmas.”

The foundation of all truth and absolute law has been overthrown. Many Catholics rightly applauded Benedict XVI as he responded to the problems in the Church by trying to restore what his predecessors had demolished, but at best he was building on the same bad foundation. His conservative-leaning work masked the fact that the foundation of immutable truth continued to deteriorate.

When we abandon the foundation of immutable truth, we offend God and, in a sense, deserve to lose the helps He wants to give us to overcome the current crisis. Why, in other words, would He intervene to resolve any of our more visible problems if we remain content to live with the damaged foundation that is of itself a rejection of God’s truth? We can even see all that is happening in the Church and world today as a fitting punishment for the collective abandonment of His divine truth.

The edition of SiSiNoNo cited above argued that restoration can only come by going back to the foundation of immutable truth:
Quote:“From what we have just seen, it logically follows that true restoration can only come by traveling along in a reverse direction from the one which led to the rupture or breaking away from the Doctrinal Tradition of the Church: a return to constant and durable philosophy, and therefore to Scholastic Theology, therefore to the Dogmatic tradition of the Church in faithful obedience to the constant directives and teachings of the Magisterium of all the Popes.”

This is not nearly as difficult as it may seem. Unlike the political realm in which our voices and votes count for nothing, in God’s Holy Catholic Church those who tell the truth have the power to build while others are destroying. So long as we act with charity, we never have to fear “offending the authorities” if we insist on immutable Catholic truth and reject the errors contrary to it. And today we have more reason than ever to know that the pre-Vatican II popes were correct when they denounced the Modernist and Liberal errors: we know this because we see firsthand the same damage they said would occur when Catholics abandoned truth and embraced errors.

God is God. You cannot reject the holy and salutary truths He gave us without causing tremendous damage. We need saints, but we cannot have saints without the immutable Catholic Faith. We need a Catholic pope, but there is little hope of a Catholic pope until Catholics want immutable Catholic Faith. We need to overturn the godless schemes to erect a New World Order, but we can do that only with the immutable Catholic Faith God gave us. Hence, the most pressing need in the world today is to restore belief in the immutable Catholic Faith.

Immaculate Heart of Mary, pray for us!

Print this item

  Vatican officials deny involvement in rumored Latin Mass crackdown
Posted by: Stone - 08-11-2024, 05:26 AM - Forum: Vatican II and the Fruits of Modernism - No Replies

Vatican officials deny involvement in rumored Latin Mass crackdown
The papal nuncio to France, Archbishop Celestino Migliore, and Cardinal Claudio Gugerotti have both denied to this correspondent that they are involved in fresh efforts to restrict the Traditional Latin Mass.

[Image: Migliore-Gugerotti.jpg]

Abp. Migliore (L), Cdl. Gugerotti ®
Nanovic Institute for European Studies/Mazur/cbcew.org.uk

Aug 9, 2024
VATICAN CITY (LifeSiteNews [slightly adapted, not all hyperlinks included]) — Two of the four Vatican officials reported to be aiding efforts to restrict the traditional Mass have denied any such involvement, whilst rumors not always in accord with evidence continue to stoke fears of upcoming restrictions.

The papal nuncio to France, Archbishop Celestino Migliore, and the prefect of the Dicastery for Eastern Churches, Cardinal Claudio Gugerotti, have both denied to this correspondent that they are involved in fresh efforts to restrict the traditional Mass.

Both Migliore and Gugerotti had been named in a June report by The Remnant, along with Cardinal Secretary of State Pietro Parolin, as being the three key aides in a move to compile a new document ushering in restrictions on the traditional Mass.

The document is believed to be being written by Archbishop Vittorio Francesco Viola, who serves as the Secretary of the Congregation for Divine Worship and Discipline of the Sacraments (CDW), and who – according to some reports – is drawing up a text restricting the traditional Mass which he will present to Pope Francis for approval.

But when questioned by this correspondent, Migliore and Gugerotti denied that they were supporting or encouraging Viola in his project. Full details are provided below, but first some background and context is necessary.


Background to rumors

On June 17, the traditional blog Rorate Caeli issued a report suggesting that the Vatican is set to publish new measures restricting the traditional Mass even further than it already is. Rorate wrote that there is an attempt to implement a “stringent, radical, and final solution banning the Traditional Latin Mass.”

Describing their sources as “credible,” Rorate stated that the sources for the information were

Quote:the very same sources that revealed to Rorate that the Vatican had sent out a survey to bishops on Summorum Pontificum (in preparation for what would become Traditionis Custodes), and Rorate was the first source to post this; and the very same sources who first revealed that a document like Traditionis Custodes would come (and Rorate was also the first to reveal it at the time). [Emphasis original]

Rorate’s report was published by one of the site’s editors known as “New Catholic”: this correspondent understands that “New Catholic” has kept information about his sources strictly to himself.


Where would it come from?

No information was given by Rorate as to which body of the Roman Curia would be leading operations in issuing any new document. Were it to affect the former Ecclesia Dei traditional Mass communities, then it would have to also involve the Congregation (now Dicastery) for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life (CICLSAL).

However, with Pope Francis having just recently met with, and affirmed the charism of, the two most notable ex-Ecclesia Dei communities offering the traditional Mass – the FSSP and the ICKSP – it is therefore unlikely that restrictions would be ushered in against them via CICLSAL, and would therefore be issued via the CDW.

Indeed when this correspondent questioned the notoriously anti-traditional prefect of CICLSAL – Cardinal João Braz de Aviz – if his dicastery had any document restricting the traditional Mass, his secretary issued a reply July 4, stating:

Quote:We cannot answer your question because the topic is not our responsibility but that of the Dicastery for Divine Worship. [Emphasis original]

Such would correspond with the information reported by The Remnant, which cited “well-informed sources” as stating that the rumored document “would prohibit all priests other than those belonging to approved ex-Ecclesia Dei institutes from offering the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass in the Vetus Ordo, or old rite as it is commonly called.” This would involved the CDW, rather than CICLSAL.

It appears from these two aspects that the rumored document would originate from the offices of the CDW, and chiefly by the hand of Archbishop Viola.


Disagreement over existence of document

But sources disagree on the existence of the document. Rorate was the first to report that it existed and has maintained that position, with The Remnant following suit in supporting the argument some days later.

“I have been informed by reliable sources that a new Vatican document more restrictive than Traditionis Custodes does indeed exist, is backed by Vatican Secretary of State Cardinal Pietro Parolin, and has been presented to Pope Francis,” wrote Diane Montagna for The Remmant.

Well-placed Vatican sources close to Pope Francis questioned by this correspondent could not attest to the existence of the document. They highlighted the confusion emanating from the Vatican about the current state of affairs regarding the future of the traditional Mass, though none of the sources consulted denied that such a document might exist.

Nor has The Pillar been able to confirm existence of the rumored document, despite its record of having talkative and apparently well-placed sources throughout the Vatican and especially in the Secretariat of State – the office led by Cardinal Parolin, who is reportedly a key advocate of measures to restrict the traditional Mass.

Cardinal Arthur Roche – prefect of the CDW – and Parolin have not replied to email questions by this correspondent about the rumored document. Roche has, in the meantime, blocked this correspondent on a social media platform.

A source previously informed LifeSiteNews’ John-Henry Westen that the rumored document was likely to be published on July 16, the third anniversary of Traditionis Custodes, the 2021 motu proprio through which Francis ushered in sweeping restrictions on the traditional Mass. The date swiftly became the international focus of much hype, both in the media and for Catholics outside of the media bubble.

The reports – by Rorate and The Remnant – which attested to the existence of the document did not give any details about such a date. Nothing was issued by the Vatican on July 16, with the month officially being a quieter holiday period for Pope Francis.


Vatican officials deny involvement

While Rorate’s original reports had been sparse in providing details of any fresh restrictions, The Remnant’s report provided names of its alleged proponents and details of its alleged contents.

As noted above, papal nuncio Migliore – who is noted for his stance opposing the traditional Mass in France – was listed as a key supporter, along with the prefect of the Dicastery for Eastern Churches Cardinal Gugerotti and Vatican Secretary of State Cardinal Parolin.

After 21 years as a nuncio, Gugerotti returned to the Dicastery for Eastern Church in 2022 as its prefect, having served as an official in the Dicastery for 16 years prior to his diplomatic service. He was raised to the cardinalate last September.

[Image: Parolin-gugerotti.jpg]

Cardinal Parolin (center) with Abp Gugerotti ® in 2015. Credit: Paval Hadsinzki/Flickr

Following The Remnant’s June 25 report, this correspondent contacted both Migliore and Gugerotti on July 19 asking if they would comment on the report and if they were giving “support or assistance or encouragement to an attempt by Archbishop Vittoria Viola, who is preparing a new document on the ‘Latin Mass.’”

Migliore swiftly replied by saying:

Quote:Short question, short answer: these are conjectures, to say the least, fanciful.

Gugerotti’s private secretary replied August 6 with a less direct statement, which nevertheless appeared to distance the cardinal from the rumored document. The reply read:

Quote:Thank you for your kind request, of which His Eminence Cardinal Claudio Gugerotti, Prefect of the Dicastery for the Oriental Churches, has taken careful note. In this regard, I would like to inform you that no information appears on the subject to which you refer.

Parolin has yet to reply to the same question posed to Migliore and Gugerotti.


Denials and confusion

In early 2023, similar rumors abounded that Cardinal de Aviz was set to issue issue a document which would usher in hefty restrictions on the former Ecclesia Dei communities. This correspondent managed to meet with de Aviz on April 5 last year, and the cardinal firmly denied that his dicastery was going to issue any such document and that he was not aware of any such document.

READ: EXCLUSIVE: Vatican dicastery denies involvement with rumored document crushing traditional seminaries

The rumored text never emerged, though the strong body of evidence from multiple sources speaking to multiple news outlets and journalists indicated that the document did indeed exist, despite Cdl. de Aviz’s denial. This correspondent’s own Vatican sources also attested to the fact that the document did exist, with the sources adding that the only question was whether it might be published or not.

With the official denials of Migliore and Gugerotti about their involvement in the rumored 2024 document, in the face of reports which named them as specifically involved, the confusion over the entire case appears to grow.

The Remnant places faith in its sources which name the pair amongst the three key supporters of Archbishop Viola; should a document soon emerge and Migliore and Gugerotti be found to have been supporting it, then they would have lied on record to a journalist.

In the meantime, Argentine Catholic blog Caminante Wanderer (CW) published a July 22 report (translated and republished by Rorate) which attested that Francis had actually received a copy of the rumored document but had not signed it. CW suggested that this was partly due to Francis not being as devoted to attacking the Latin Mass as Abp. Viola is – as highlighted already – but partly due to the outpouring of petitions and vocal calls defending the Mass made in recent weeks.

However, in an apparent discrepancy with official details, CW stated that Cardinal Roche had fallen out of favor with Francis – an aspect which sources for multiple outlets do confirm – and that he had not been received in papal audience since February 2022.

Official records of the Pope’s audiences show that Roche was received by Francis in June 2022 with the leadership of the CDW. Roche was then received again in January 2023, in February 2023, and (with the CDW leadership) in September 2023.

Either the Holy See’s records are not accurate or the sources for that aspect of CW’s report were not informed correctly.

Whatever the case, it serves to highlight the immense confusion and lack of clarity surrounding the entire affair, with numerous Catholics concerned over the future of the traditional Mass. With denials, contradictory evidence and rumors circulating, the truth of the affair appears elusive in many respects.

Print this item

  Holy Mass in Montana - August 18, 2024
Posted by: Stone - 08-09-2024, 12:26 PM - Forum: August 2024 - No Replies

Holy Sacrifice of the Mass - Thirteenth Sunday after Pentecost

[Image: ?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.pinimg.com%2F736x%2F9...ipo=images]


Date: Sunday, August 18, 2024


Time: Confessions - 9:30 AM
              Holy Mass - 10:00 AM


Location: Montana [call for directions]


Contact: Ben 406-471-0164



+ + +

Please note: There will be no livestream for this Sunday Mass as the remote location does not have reliable internet.

Print this item

  Holy Mass in Montana - August 11, 2024
Posted by: Stone - 08-09-2024, 12:23 PM - Forum: August 2024 - No Replies

Holy Sacrifice of the Mass - Twelfth Sunday after Pentecost

[Image: ?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftse1.mm.bing.net%2Fth%3...ipo=images]


Date: Sunday, August 11, 2024


Time: Confessions - 9:30 AM
              Holy Mass - 10:00 AM


Location: Montana [call for directions]


Contact: Ben 406-471-0164



+ + +

Please note: There will be no livestream for this Sunday Mass as the remote location does not have reliable internet.

Print this item

  Holy Mass in Idaho [Post Falls area] - August 25, 2024
Posted by: Stone - 08-09-2024, 06:33 AM - Forum: August 2024 - Replies (1)

Holy Sacrifice of the Mass - Fourteenth Sunday after Pentecost

[Image: ?u=https%3A%2F%2Fimages.fineartamerica.c...ipo=images]


Date: Sunday, August 25, 2024


Time: Confessions - 9:30 AM
              Holy Mass - 10:00 AM


Location: Post Falls area - contact coordinator below for details
                     

Contact: Rich 208-290-2649
                   pascendi1907@gmail.com

Print this item

  Taylor Marshall Interview w/ Archbishop Viganò
Posted by: Stone - 08-09-2024, 06:24 AM - Forum: Archbishop Viganò - Replies (1)

In two parts:


Part I - VIGANO + MARSHALL INTERVIEW: Abp. Vigano exposes Fake 3rd Secret, Vatican Bank and Excommunication





Part II - VIGANO + MARSHALL INTERVIEW part 2: Vigano talks B16s Resignation, Sedevacantism, SSPX, FSSP, ICK

Print this item

  Fr Hewko Conference: Meditation on Our Lady's Assumption 8/3/24 (NH)
Posted by: Deus Vult - 08-07-2024, 08:37 PM - Forum: Conferences - No Replies

15 minute Meditation on Our Lady's Assumption 8/3/24 (NH)


Print this item

  Stories of the Miraculous intervention of the Blessed Virgin Mary by St. Alphonsus
Posted by: Stone - 08-06-2024, 07:56 AM - Forum: Our Lady - No Replies

Stories of the Miraculous intervention of the Blessed Virgin Mary by St. Alphonsus


Print this item

  Vatican’s Response to the Olympic Scandal Rewards the Mental Gymnastics of Conservative Catholics
Posted by: Stone - 08-06-2024, 06:53 AM - Forum: General Commentary - No Replies

The Vatican’s Response to the Olympic Scandal Rewards the Mental Gymnastics of Conservative Catholics

[Image: ee83eb087a970eebab7bdac4aceda7c3_L.jpg]


Robert Morrison, Remnant Columnist | August 5, 2024

The recent scandal of the Paris Olympics has brought all of this together in a blasphemous tableau. In it, we saw not only the LGBQT+ portrayal of the Last Supper but also the celebration of the French Revolution, complete with the decapitated head of Queen Marie-Antoinette singing along to a heavy metal song. But the most anti-Catholic touch of all has now been delivered by Francis’s Vatican, with its Communiqué about the opening ceremony.

In his Principles of Catholic Theology, Cardinal Ratzinger compared Vatican II’s Gaudium et Spes, Dignitatis Humanae, and Nostra Aetate to the French Revolution of 1789:
Quote:“If it is desirable to offer a diagnosis of the text [Gaudium et Spes] as a whole, we might say that (in conjunction with the texts on religious liberty [Dignitatis Humanae] and world religions [Nostra Aetate]) it is a revision of the Syllabus of Pius IX, a kind of countersyllabus. . . Let us be content to say that the text serves as a countersyllabus and, as such, represents, on the part of the Church, an attempt at an official reconciliation with the new era inaugurated in 1789.” (Principles of Catholic Theology, 1987, pp. 381-2)

The future Benedict XVI was not mistaken in suggesting that Vatican II was an attempt at official reconciliation of Catholicism with the ideas of the French Revolution. The Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, to which Ratzinger alluded, specifically condemned the Liberal ideas which resonated with the revolutionary ideas of 1789, and which eventually worked their way into Vatican II’s documents. We can see this clearly if we merely consider five statements condemned by the Syllabus of Errors, which were at least implicitly promoted by Vatican II:
Quote:* 15. Every man is free to embrace and profess that religion which, guided by the light of reason, he shall consider true.

* 16. Man may, in the observance of any religion whatever, find the way of eternal salvation, and arrive at eternal salvation.

* 17. Good hope at least is to be entertained of the eternal salvation of all those who are not at all in the true Church of Christ.

* 79. Moreover, it is false that the civil liberty of every form of worship, and the full power, given to all, of overtly and publicly manifesting any opinions whatsoever and thoughts, conduce more easily to corrupt the morals and minds of the people, and to propagate the pest of indifferentism.

* 80. The Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization.

From the time of the French Revolution until Vatican II, the popes consistently condemned Liberal errors such as these because they threatened the Catholic Faith. Pope Pius VI was the first to condemn the French Revolution, and in his Quod Aliquantum from 1791 he wrote that the revolution sought to abolish the Catholic Religion:
Quote:“. . . this National Assembly has arrogated to itself the power of the Church, going so far as to establish so many strange things, which are contrary both to the Dogma and to ecclesiastical discipline, forcing the Bishops and all the Ecclesiastics to swear to carry out what it has decreed. Furthermore, anyone who notes from the Constitution of the Assembly itself should not be surprised by this fact that it aims at nothing else and seeks nothing else other than the abolition of the Catholic Religion and, with this, also of the obedience due to Kings. With this plan precisely establishes as a principle of natural law that man living in Society must be fully free, that is to say that in matters of Religion he must not be disturbed by anyone, and can freely think as he pleases, and write and even publish by means of print anything related to Religion.”

This last sentence surely seems correct to many Catholics today who champion the “freedom of expression,” but it was universally condemned by the popes prior to Vatican II. Pope Pius VI continued by explaining why such ideas were dangerous and absurd:
Quote:“The Assembly itself has declared that these statements . . . derive from the equality of men among themselves and from natural freedom. But what greater foolishness can be imagined than to consider all men equal and free in such a way that nothing is accorded to reason, with which man has mainly been provided by nature and by which he distinguishes himself from beasts? When God created the first man and placed him in the earthly Paradise, did he not at the same time impose the death penalty on him if he tasted the fruits of the tree of the science of good and evil? Didn't he immediately put a brake on his freedom with this first precept? And after man had made himself guilty by his disobedience, did not God add many other precepts, which were promulgated by Moses? . . . Where then is that freedom to think and act, which the decrees of the Assembly attribute to man living in society as an immutable right of nature? Therefore, for what results from these decrees, according to them it will be necessary to contradict the right of the Creator, through whom we exist, and from whose liberality everything that we are and that we have must be recognized.”

Liberals clamor for the “rights of man,” but the Catholic Church reminds us that the infinitely superior “rights of the Creator” must be respected if ever the two sets of rights conflict. The pre-Vatican II popes warned against the errors of Liberalism because these popes sought both to honor the “rights of the Creator” as well as to safeguard Catholics from the great evils that result from asserting “rights of man” that deviate from God’s law.

As we can see from the 1876 letter of Pope Pius IX to the editors of a Catholic newspaper of Rodez, the pre-Vatican II popes condemned these errors under the heading of “Catholic Liberalism” (promoted by “Liberal Catholics”):
Quote:“We certainly do approve your endeavor to defend and explain the decisions of our Syllabus, especially those points which condemn the so-called ‘Catholic Liberalism,’ which has a large number of adherents among honest men. This error seems to be close to the truth and thus becomes very dangerous since it so easily deceives those who are not on their guard, and, because it unperceivebly and secretly destroys the Catholic mind, it greatly reduces Catholic strength while increasing that of the enemy’s.” (quoted by Fr. A. Roussel in Liberalism & Catholicism, p. 122)

So those who opposed Pope Pius IX’s Syllabus of Errors were proponents of “Catholic Liberalism,” which “secretly destroys the Catholic mind.” Because Vatican II opposed and contradicted the Syllabus of Errors, the heirs of Catholic Liberalism became those “Conservative Catholics” who defend Vatican II’s efforts to reconcile Catholicism with the ideas of the French Revolution. As honest and devout as they may be, these Conservative Catholics have been deceived by the revolutionaries who convinced them that the Church could legitimately contradict what it had consistently taught.

As a result, these “Conservative Catholics” have spent the past sixty years questioning the horrendous fruits of Vatican II but consoling themselves with the thought that they were on the side of John XXIII and his successors. In recent years, Francis has made many of these Conservative Catholics far less secure in their convictions. Rather than realizing that the pre-Vatican II popes were correct — which might lead them to reject the novelties of the Vatican II revolution — these Conservative Catholics have generally tended to believe that Francis must be deviating from Vatican II, even though he continually reminds us that the Council is the entire theological foundation of his religious beliefs.

The recent scandal of the Paris Olympics has brought all of this together in a blasphemous tableau. In it, we saw not only the LGBQT+ portrayal of the Last Supper but also the celebration of the French Revolution, complete with the decapitated head of Queen Marie-Antoinette singing along to a heavy metal song. But the most anti-Catholic touch of all has now been delivered by Francis’s Vatican, with its Communiqué about the opening ceremony:
Quote:“The Holy See was saddened by certain scenes during the opening ceremony of the Paris Olympic Games and can only join the voices that have been raised in recent days to deplore the offence caused to many Christians and believers of other religions. At a prestigious event where the whole world comes together to share common values, there should be no allusions ridiculing the religious convictions of many people. The freedom of expression, which is clearly not called into question here, is limited by respect for others.”

According to the Vatican, it was the “religious convictions of many people” that was offended, not God and His Holy Catholic Church. And, justifiably, the Conservative Catholics are appalled at the Vatican's lukewarm condemnation of the opening ceremony’s grotesque blasphemy. Will they awaken to the reality that Vatican II’s Dignitatis Humanae — which Cardinal Ratzinger said was part of the Council’s embrace of the ideas of 1789 — contradicted the Syllabus of Errors when it asserted the rights of man demand freedom of religious expression, such as what we saw at the Olympics?:
Quote:“The social nature of man, however, itself requires that he should give external expression to his internal acts of religion: that he should share with others in matters religious; that he should profess his religion in community. Injury therefore is done to the human person and to the very order established by God for human life, if the free exercise of religion is denied in society, provided just public order is observed.”

So, according to Vatican II, the “social nature of man” requires that everyone should be able to freely express his or her religious beliefs (which obviously includes hatred for established religion) in community, limited solely by “just public order.” With this in mind, we can read again the last sentence of the Vatican’s Communiqué on the blasphemous Paris Olympics opening ceremony:
Quote:"The freedom of expression, which is clearly not called into question here, is limited by respect for others.”

The Vatican could not have issued a more forceful “condemnation” of the Olympic blasphemies without running afoul of the teaching of Vatican II’s Dignitatis Humanae. Some may wonder, though, why the Vatican did not condemn the Paris Olympics for banning various expressions of Christianity (and other religions). We have the ultimate explanation if we simply recall that Pope Pius VI told us that the French Revolution, which inspired the Vatican II revolution, “seeks nothing else other than the abolition of the Catholic Religion.” Thus, it should be obvious that we are all reaping what the proponents of Vatican II’s revolutionary ideas have sowed. The Conservative Catholics who have perfected their mental gymnastics over the decades by defending the Council’s novelties now have their filthy reward in the Olympic blasphemy and the Vatican’s faux condemnation of it.

Tolerating and promoting errors has brought us to this state of grave crisis in the Church and throughout the world, but all is not lost. As the Conservative Catholics were promoting the Vatican II’s embrace of the ideas of the French Revolution, they were also denouncing Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, who left us with these words of holy inspiration in his They Have Uncrowned Him:
Quote:“As for me, I will not resign; I will not content myself with being present, my arms dangling, at the death-throes of my Mother the Holy Church. . . If this is how things are, you will understand that, in spite of everything, I am not a pessimist. The Holy Virgin will have the victory. She will triumph over the great apostasy, the fruit of Liberalism. One more reason not to twiddle our thumbs! We have to fight more than ever for the social Reign of Our Lord Jesus Christ. In this battle, we are not alone: we have with us all the Popes up through Pius XII inclusively. All of them combatted Liberalism in order to deliver the Church from it. God did not grant that they succeed, but this is no reason to lay down our weapons! We have to hold on. We have to build, while the others are demolishing.” (pp. 250-251)

With every passing day, Francis and his fellow revolutionaries give us further proof that the pre-Vatican II popes were correct in denouncing the Liberal errors that animated the Council’s unholy revolution. The fight of those pre-Vatican II popes, and all of the saints, is our fight, and we are assured of participating in God’s victory if we hold on while Satan and his minions insist that now is the time to give up.

Immaculate Heart of Mary, pray for us!

Print this item

  Nicaragua Escalates Repression Against Catholic Clergy
Posted by: Stone - 08-06-2024, 06:43 AM - Forum: Anti-Catholic Violence - No Replies

Nicaragua Escalates Repression Against Catholic Clergy


The Tico Times | August 4, 2024

At least 12 priests have been arrested in recent days in a new wave of detentions targeting Catholic Church clergy in Nicaragua, according to a human rights NGO operating from exile in Costa Rica.

“In the last 48 hours, there has been a repressive escalation against priests of the Catholic Church” in the Matagalpa department, in the northern part of the country, stated the Colectivo Nicaragua Nunca Más in a communiqué.

“Several parishes have been besieged, and at least 12 priests have been arbitrarily detained, some of whom are now missing and in a state of enforced disappearance,” the organization specified.

On Thursday and Friday, Nicaraguan police carried out operations in parishes of the dioceses of Matagalpa and Estelí (north), reported Martha Patricia Molina, a lawyer and researcher on church-related issues, currently exiled in the United States, via social media platform X.

Nicaraguan human rights activist Haydee Castillo, also exiled in the United States, stated on X that “last night Matagalpa was besieged by police and paramilitary forces.” The Nicaraguan government has not commented on these reports.

President Daniel Ortega and his wife, Vice President Rosario Murillo, claim that the Church supported the 2018 protests against the government, which resulted in over 300 deaths according to the UN, and which Managua considers an attempted coup sponsored by Washington.

Murillo has described the clergy as “children of the devil” or “agents of evil” who engage in “spiritual terrorism.” “This is the largest crackdown since December 2023,” when another dozen priests were detained, the collective stated. In January, about thirty religious figures were released and sent to the Vatican.

A week ago, a group of United Nations experts denounced that the Nicaraguan government has maintained “systematic” attacks against the Catholic Church and other Christian denominations since the 2018 protests.

From April 2018 to March 2024, the group documented “73 cases of arbitrary detentions of members of the Catholic Church and other Christian denominations,” although they noted that “the total number could be higher.”

Print this item

  Hotez Calls For Police Deployment Against "Anti-Vaxxers"
Posted by: Stone - 08-04-2024, 06:16 AM - Forum: Socialism & Communism - No Replies

Hotez Calls For Police Deployment Against "Anti-Vaxxers"

[Image: Shutterstock_2204313927-800x469.jpg?itok=qBKiw0Cw]


ZH | Aug 03, 2024
Authored by Paul Thacker via The Brownstone Institute,

Social media went a little bonkers last week when an interview of Texas Children’s Hospital’s Dr. Peter Hotez began circulating with the Big Pharma insider calling for the United Nations and NATO to deploy security forces against “anti-vaxxers” in the United States. Dr. Hotez’s statements first appeared on the YouTube channel of an international pediatric conference that took place in Colombia, but the interview then jumped onto X.

The Simposio Internacional de Actualización en Pediatría (International Symposium of Pediatric Updates) later removed the interview from YouTube although photos can still be found on Facebook.

In clips of Hotez’s interview that continue to circulate on X, he claims “anti-vaxxers” caused hundreds of thousands of deaths in the United States. I uploaded one clip to my YouTube channel which you can watch here:
Quote:What I’ve said to the Biden administration is, the health sector can’t solve this on its own. We’re going to have to bring in Homeland Security, the Commerce Department, Justice Department to help us understand how to do this.

I’ve said the same with…I met with [WHO general director] Dr. Tedros last month…to say, I don’t know that the World Health Organization can solve this on our own. We need the other United Nations agencies—NATO. This is a security problem, because it’s no longer a theoretical construct or some arcane academic exercise. Two hundred thousand Americans died because of anti-vaccine aggression, anti-science aggression.

And so, this is now a lethal force…and now I feel as a pediatric vaccine scientist…it’s important, just as important for me to make new vaccines, to save lives. The other side of saving lives is countering this anti-vaccine aggression.

Hotez has long been noted for promoting controversial and sometimes false statements about the Covid pandemic and then accusing his critics of “anti-science.”

[Image: image-71-758x800.jpg?itok=7jFVe_fk]

But this is not the first time Hotez has called for police to deploy against those who disagree with his views on science. Last October, Scientific American platformed Hotez as an expert on “anti-science” and didn’t bat an eyelid when he said support for scientists would require intervention by the Department of Homeland Security and the creation of a federal interagency task force.

[Image: image-72-539x800.jpg?itok=-xLcHWhs]

Dr. Hotez again called for deploying federal police to support science during a grand rounds lecture he gave in August 2021. A whistleblower at Texas Children’s Hospital sent me the lecture where Hotez said the “disinformation empire” threatened America and would need to be dealt with by the Department of Homeland Security:
Quote:The problem is the disinformation empire is so vast and pervasive that until we do something more definitive to get to the source of the disinformation and stop it, it’s not going to have that much of an impact. And that’s where everybody moves away from me.

And I tend to be out on a…out on my own here.


Earlier this year, Time Magazine named Hotez a “Science Warrior” and one of the 100 most influential people in global health.


Republished from the author’s Substack

Print this item

  Eight days too late: Vatican Condemns Olympic Opening Ceremonies
Posted by: Stone - 08-04-2024, 06:06 AM - Forum: Pope Francis - Replies (1)

Vatican 'saddened' by 'certain scenes' at Olympics' opening ceremony
The ceremony depicted a mock Last Supper with drag queens


Fox News | August 3, 2024

The opening ceremony of the Olympics was immediately under criticism, and it "saddened" Pope Francis.

A statement released by the Vatican Saturday evening said there should be "no allusions ridiculing the religious convictions of many people."

"The Holy See was saddened by certain scenes during the opening ceremony of the Paris Olympic Games and can only join the voices that have been raised in recent days to deplore the offence caused to many Christians and believers of other religions," the statement said.

"At a prestigious event where the whole world comes together to share common values, there should be no allusions ridiculing the religious convictions of many people. The freedom of expression, which is clearly not called into question here, is limited by respect for others."

The ceremony turned heads when it included a headless Marie Antoinette early on, then a ménage à trois.

However, what made critics most angry was when the ceremony appeared to depict a mock Last Supper with people dressed in drag.

The performance took place during a floating parade on the Seine River last week and featured drag queens seated around a table with one person, painted blue, sitting atop the table. Many argue the display resembled the Da Vinci painting depicting a scene from the Gospel of John when Jesus announces that one of his apostles would betray him.

There's been mixed messaging from Olympic organizers over what was behind the drag scene. One spokesperson reportedly admitted to the New York Post that creative director Thomas Jolly took inspiration from da Vinci's painting, "The Last Supper." Others have claimed no offense was intended, and it was merely a nod to Greek mythology.

Many Christian faith leaders and celebrities, like Kansas City Chiefs kicker Harrison Butker, fitness guru Jillian Michaels, Elon Musk, actress Candace Cameron Bure and ex-transgender influencer Oli London, expressed disappointment in the depiction.

U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La.; Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene; Italy’s Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini; conservative French politician and European Parliament member Marion Maréchal; and Hungary’s ambassador to the Vatican, Eduard Habsburg, are among officials who condemned the presentation.

Print this item

  Francis pens fourth letter to LGBTQ activist Fr. James Martin
Posted by: Stone - 08-03-2024, 06:23 AM - Forum: Pope Francis - No Replies

Francis "Spiritually United with Homosex Conference"


gloria.tv [slightly adapted] | August 1, 2024

Francis has once again written a letter, dated July 11, to the homosexual activist James Martin, a "Jesuit".

It is his fourth letter in connection with Martin's homosexual propaganda group 'Outreach'. The occasion for this letter is an Outreach conference on August 2 to 4 at the Jesuit-run Georgetown University with some 300 participants.

A Eucharist on Saturday will be presided over by the homosexual activist Wilton Gregory who is also Cardinal of Washington.

Francis wrote to Martin a few lines in Spanish:

Quote:Dear brother,

Thank you very much for your [10 July] e-mail.

I am happy that Cardinal Gregory will preside over a Eucharist; I will be spiritually with him and with all of you, united in prayer.

Thank you for praying for me. I do the same for you. May Jesus bless you and the Blessed Virgin protect you.

[Image: paojoese5d01awbbp2khdzsxqpsb3ym1b3yafyu....24&webp=on]

Print this item

  Erdoğan Calls on Mute Francis to Defend Christ
Posted by: Stone - 08-03-2024, 06:13 AM - Forum: Pope Francis - No Replies

Erdoğan Calls on Mute Francis to Defend Christ


gloria.tv |August 2, 2024

Following the blasphemy at the Paris Olympics, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has called on Francis to "speak out together".

Francis loves to speak out on almost everything, but only when he knows he has the media activists of the oligarchs on his side, who, however, love blasphemies against Christ.

According to Abc.es (1 August), Francis "finished his holidays" on Wednesday, which allowed (sic) him to take the phone call with Erdoğan.

In reality, Erdoğan forced Francis to take the phone call because he had publicly announced on Tuesday that he would call Francis to share his "indignation" at the "immoral demonstrations during the opening ceremony of the Paris Olympic Games".

Turkish government sources said on social media that during the conversation Erdoğan criticised that "under the pretext of 'freedom of expression and tolerance', human dignity is being trampled upon and religious and moral values are being mocked, which offends both Muslims and the Christian world".

As a result, he said, "it is necessary to raise a united voice and show a common attitude against these offences".

The embarrassed Vatican did not give details of Francis' response, but the Turkish government has assured that Francis thanked Erdoğan [very privately] for "his sensitivity to the humiliation of religious values".

When Erdoğan publicly explained the reasons for the call to members of his AKP party on Tuesday, he told them he wanted to "share with the Pope the immorality committed against the Christian world and against all Christians".

He noted that "the Olympic Games have been used as an instrument of perversion that corrupts human nature".


* * *


AP: After Olympics, Turkey's Erdogan seeks unity with Pope Francis against acts that mock sacred values

[Image: 39uhm539o2jyi9nm99uursjmbyhswz6t7k4h0zj....61&webp=on]

gloria.tv [adapted] | August 2, 2024

After Olympics, Turkey's Erdogan seeks unity with Pope Francis against acts that mock sacred values (yahoo.com)

ANKARA, Turkey (AP) — Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan spoke with Pope Francis on Thursday about the “immoral display” at the opening ceremony of the Paris Olympics and called for a unified stance against acts that ridicule sacred values, according to a statement from Erdogan’s office.

The Turkish leader told the pontiff in a telephone call that “human dignity was being trampled on, religious and moral values were being mocked, offending Muslims as much as the Christian world,” the statement said.

In an unprecedented display of inclusivity, drag queens took center stage at the ceremony last week, showcasing the vibrant and influential role of the French LGBTQ+ community.

But the ceremony also attracted criticism over a tableau reminiscent of Leonardo da Vinci’s “The Last Supper.” The scene featured drag queens and other performers in a configuration reminiscent of Jesus Christ and his apostles.

Erdogan, who has adopted a staunch anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric in recent years, conveyed to the pope the necessity “to raise our voices together and take a common stance against these,” according to the statement.

The Turkish leader, whose ruling party has roots in the country's Islamic movement, often labels the LGBTQ+ community as “deviant” and a danger to traditional family values.

Pride marches in Turkey have been banned since 2015.

Print this item

  The Rosary: A School of Contemplation – Garrigou-Lagrange, 1941
Posted by: Stone - 08-02-2024, 05:21 AM - Forum: Prayers and Devotionals - No Replies

The Rosary: A School of Contemplation – Garrigou-Lagrange, 1941
“The words are a kind of melody which soothes the ear and isolates us from the noise of the world.”

[Image: https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.ama...2x675.jpeg]

Image: Wiki Commons CC

WM Review | Oct 10, 2022


The Rosary: A School of Contemplation from The Mother of the Saviour and Our Interior Life
by Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange OP

Some line breaks and headings added for clarity.

From among the many customary devotions to Our Lady, such as the Angelus, the Office of the Blessed Virgin, the Rosary, we shall speak especially of the last in so far as it prepares us for and leads us up to contemplation of the great mysteries of salvation. After Holy Mass it is one of the most beautiful and efficacious forms of prayer, on condition of understanding it and living it.

It sometimes happens that its recitation – reduced to that of five mysteries – becomes a matter of routine. The mind, not being really gripped by the things of God, finds itself a prey to distractions. Sometimes the prayer is said hurriedly and soullessly. Sometimes it is said for the purpose of obtaining temporal favours, desired out of all relation to spiritual gain. When a person says the Rosary in such a way, he may well ask himself in what way his prayer is like that of which Pope Leo XIII spoke in his encyclicals on the Rosary, and about which Pius XI wrote one of his last apostolic letters.

It is true that to pray well it is sufficient to think in a general way of God and of the graces for which one asks. But to make the most out of our five mysteries, we should remember that they constitute but a third of the whole Rosary, and that they should be accompanied by meditation – which can be very simple – on the Joyful, Sorrowful and Glorious Mysteries, which recall the whole life of Jesus and Mary and their glory in Heaven.


The Three Great Mysteries of Salvation

The fifteen mysteries of the Rosary thus divided into three groups are but different aspects of the three great mysteries of our salvation: the Incarnation, the Redemption, Eternal Life.

The mystery of the Incarnation is recalled by the joys of the Annunciation, the Visitation, the Birth of the Saviour, His Presentation in the Temple and His finding among the doctors.

The mystery of the Redemption is recalled by the different stages of the Passion: the Agony in the garden, the Scourging, the Crowning with thorns, the Carrying of the Cross, the Crucifixion.

The mystery of eternal life is recalled by the Resurrection, the Ascension, Pentecost, the Assumption of Our Lady and her crowning as Queen of Heaven.

Thus, the Rosary is a Credo: not an abstract one, but one concretised in the life of Jesus who came down to us from the Father and who ascended to bring us back with Himself to the Father. It is the whole of Christian dogma in all its splendour and elevation, brought to us that we may fill our minds with it, that we may relish it and nourish our souls with it.

This makes the Rosary a true school of contemplation. It raises us gradually above vocal prayer and even above reasoned out or discursive meditation. Early theologians have compared the movement of the soul in contemplation to the spiral in which certain birds – the swallow, for example – move when they wish to attain to a great height. The Joyful Mysteries lead to the Passion, and the Passion to the door of Heaven.

The Rosary well understood is, therefore, a very elevated form of prayer which makes the whole of dogma accessible to all.


Practical and Contemplative

The Rosary is also a very practical form of prayer for it recalls all Christian morality and spirituality by presenting them from the sublime point of view of their realisation in Jesus and Mary. The mysteries of the Rosary should be reproduced in our lives. Each of them is a lesson in some virtue – particularly in the virtues of humility, trust, patience and charity.

There are three stages in our progress towards God. The first is to have knowledge of the final end, whence comes the desire of salvation and the joy to which that desire gives rise. This stage is symbolised in the joyful mysteries which contain the good news of the Incarnation of the Son of God who opens to us the way of salvation. The next stage is to adopt the means – often painful to nature – to be delivered from sin and to merit Heaven. This is the stage of the sorrowful mysteries. The final stage is that of rest in the possession of eternal life. It is the stage of Heaven, of which the glorious mysteries allow us some anticipated glimpse.

The Rosary is therefore most practical. It takes us from the midst of our too human interests and joys and makes us think of those which centre on the coming of the Saviour. It takes us from our meaningless fears, from the sufferings we bear so badly, and reminds us of how much Jesus has suffered for love of us and teaches us to follow Him by bearing the cross which divine providence has sent us to purify us. It takes us finally from our earthly hopes and ambitions and makes us think of the true object of Christian hope – eternal life and the graces necessary to arrive there.

The Rosary is more than a prayer of petition. It is a prayer of adoration inspired by the thought of the Incarnate God, a prayer of reparation in memory of the Passion of Our Saviour, a prayer of thanksgiving that the glorious mysteries continue to reproduce themselves in the uninterrupted entry of the elect into glory.


The Rosary and Contemplative Prayer

A more simple and still more elevated way of reciting the Rosary is, while saying it, to keep the eyes of faith fixed on the living Jesus who is always making intercession for us and who is acting upon us in accordance with the mysteries of His childhood, or His Passion, or His glory. He comes to us to make us like Himself. Let us fix our gaze on Jesus who is looking at us. His look is more than kind and understanding: it is the look of God, a look which purifies, which sanctifies, which gives peace. It is the look of our Judge and still more the look of our Saviour, our Friend, the Spouse of our souls.

A Rosary said in this way, in solitude and silence, is a most fruitful intercourse with Jesus. It is a conversation with Mary too which leads to intimacy with her Son.

We sometimes read in the lives of the saints that Our Blessed Lord reproduced in them first His childhood, then His hidden life, then His apostolic life, and finally His Passion, before allowing them to share in His glory. He comes to us in a similar way in the Rosary and, well said, it is a prayer which gradually takes the form of an intimate conversation with Jesus and Mary. It is easy to see how saintly souls have found in it a school of contemplation.


Repetition and Contemplation

It has sometimes been objected that one cannot reflect on the words and the mysteries at the same time. An answer that is often given is that it is not necessary to reflect on the words if one is meditating on or looking spiritually at one of the mysteries. The words are a kind of melody which soothes the ear and isolates us from the noise of the world around us, the fingers being occupied meanwhile in allowing one bead after another to slip through. Thus, the imagination is kept tranquil and the mind and the will are set free to be united to God.

It has also been objected that the monotony of the many repetitions in the Rosary leads necessarily to routine. This objection is valid only if the Rosary is said badly. If well said, it familiarises us with the different mysteries of salvation and recalls what these mysteries should produce in our joys, our sorrows, and our hopes. Any prayer can become a matter of routine – even the Ordinary of the Mass.

The reason is not that the prayers are imperfect, but that we do not say them as we should – with faith, confidence and love.


The spirit of the Rosary as St Dominic conceived it

To understand the Rosary better it is well to recall how St Dominic conceived it under the inspiration of Our Lady at a time when southern France was ravaged by the Albigensian heresy – a heresy which denied the infinite goodness and omnipotence of God by admitting a principle of evil which was often victorious. Not only did Albigensianism attack Christian morality, but it was opposed to dogma as well – to the great mysteries of creation, the redemptive incarnation, the descent of the Holy Ghost,’ the eternal life to which we are called.

It was at that moment that Our Blessed Lady made known to St Dominic a kind of preaching till then unknown, which she said would be one of the most powerful weapons against future errors and in future difficulties. Under her inspiration, St Dominic went into the villages of the heretics, gathered the people, and preached to them the mysteries of salvation – the Incarnation, the Redemption, Eternal Life. As Mary had taught him to do, he distinguished the different kinds of mysteries, and after each short instruction he had ten Hail Marys recited – somewhat as might happen even today at a Holy Hour.

And what the word of the preacher was unable to do, the sweet prayer of the Hail Mary did for hearts. As Mary had promised, it proved to be a most fruitful form of preaching.

If we live by the prayer of which St Dominic’s preaching is the example our joys, our sorrows, and our hopes will be purified, elevated and spiritualised. We shall see that Jesus, Our Saviour and Our Model, wishes to make us like Himself, first communicating to us something of His infant and hidden life, then something of His sorrows, and finally making us partakers of His glorious life for all eternity.

Print this item